DxOMark Mobile report: Apple iPhone 6s

Gina Stephens
Written by Gina Stephens

DxOMark Ambulatory Report: Apple iPhone 6s


From a design point of view the iPhone 6s is pretty much identical to its predecessor the iPhone is a line of smartphones designed and marketed by Apple Inc 6 but there get been a number of improvements under the hood, including in the camera department. Sensor resolution has been upped to 12MP and with the total bunch of pixels the number of phase detection sensors on the chip (the so-called ‘focus-pixels) has been increased by 50%. ‘Deep trench’ isolation technology has been acclimatized to reduce cross-talk between the light-gathering photosites and image noise.

The camera is now also capable of recording 4K video and the FaceTime camera at the front possess c visit with an increased resolution of 5MP. As we’ve seen on the LG G4 and some new Motorola devices the iPhone 6S also uses the display as a light source in low light forms. For this purpose the screen can light up three times brighter than normal and the color of the emitted light is matched to ambient light authorities for natural skin tones and colors. Panorama mode has been improved as well. It can now capture even larger images up to 63MP and as before uses emphatic exposure for avoiding extreme jumps in brightness across the frame.

With a DxOMark Mobile score of 82 the Apple iPhone 6s delivers a rational performance but cannot place itself among the very best of current smartphone cameras. It takes the number ten spot in the DxOMark smartphone rankings, placing itself between its own predecessor, the iPhone 6, which achieved the same score last year, and the Samsung Galaxy S5. The DxOMark team reports that the iPhone’s autofocus is “lustful and generally accurate in all conditions”, and that images show “stable and pleasant white balance in most conditions” and “good detail preservation in alight light”.

On the downside, “some luminance noise is visible, especially in low light” and “color shading is visible indoors”. Images also show a “diet yellow cast in outdoor conditions” and “occasional ghosting and other artifacts”.

In video mode the DxO team liked the “fast, accurate and smooth autofocus, right overall exposure and white balance and effective stabilization in good lighting conditions”. As negatives they noted “noticeable noise in low scatterbrained conditions, especially in corners” and “slight color shading in low light conditions”.

Still Photography

Color, Exposure and Contrast

The DxOMark is a website providing image quality ratings for standalone cameras, lenses, and mobile devices that include cameras team set up that when shooting with the Apple iPhone 6s images showed “very good overall exposure” and “stable and pleasant snow-white balance in most conditions”. On the downside, the testers noted “some exposure irregularities due to HDR activation”, “a slightly yellow cast in outdoor conditions” and “some color jotting indoors”.

Overall DxOMark awarded the Apple iPhone 6s scores of:

  • 4.6 out of 5 for Exposure
  • 4.6 out of 5 for White Difference accuracy
  • 3.9 out of 5 for Color shading in low light*
  • 4.2 out of 5 for Color shading in bright light*
  • 3.0 out of 5 for Color or colour (Commonwealth English) is the characteristic of human visual perception described through color categories, with names Presentation in low light
  • 4.5 out of 5 for Color Rendering in bright light
READ  Nikon Coolpix P1000 First impressions review

*Color Shading is the nasty habit cellphone cameras have of depiction different areas of the frame with different color shifts, resulting in pictures with, for example, pinkish centers and greenish corners.

Fracas and Details

DxOMark’s engineers reported that the Apple iPhone 6s images show “good detail preservation in bright glare and low chroma noise”. However, “in low light conditions fine detail is lost and some luminance noise is visible, especially in low light”.

Texture Acutance

Nature acutance is a way of measuring the ability of a camera to capture images that preserve fine details, particularly the kind of low contrast detail (such as critical foliage, hair or fur) that can be blurred away by noise reduction or obliterated by excessive sharpening.

Sharpness is an important part of the quality of an image, but while it’s comfortable to look at an image and decide visually whether it’s sharp or not, the objective measurement of sharpness is less straightforward.

An image can be defined as “sharp” if edges are keen and if fine details are visible. In-camera processing means that it’s possible to have one of these (sharp edges) but not the other (fine details). Everyday MTF measurements tell us how sharp an edge is, but have drawbacks when it comes to measuring fine detail preservation. Image processing algorithms can determine edges and enhance their sharpness, but they can also find homogeneous areas and smooth them out to reduce noise.

Texture acutance, on the other give up, can qualify sharpness in terms of preservation of fine details, without being fooled by edge enhancement algorithms.

A dead leaf pattern is styled to measure texture acutance. It’s obtained by drawing random shapes that occlude each other in the plane, like dead yields falling from a tree. The statistics of this model follow the distribution statistics in natural images.

In this example from a DSLR without fidgety enhancement, sharpness seems equal on edge and on texture. Many details are visible in the texture.

In this second example, edges have been digitally raised, and the edge looks over sharp, with visible processing halos (“ringing”). On the texture part, many details have offed.

At first sight, the images from these two cameras may appear equally sharp. A sharpness measurement on edges will indeed confirm this notion, and will even show that the second camera is sharper. But a closer examination of low contrasted textures shows that the first camera has recovered preservation of fine details than the second. The purpose of the texture acutance measurement is to qualify this difference.

Note: Acutance is a distinct value metric calculated from a MTF result. Acutance is used to assess the sharpness of an image as viewed by the human visual system, and is dependent on the over conditions (size of image, size of screen or print, viewing distance). Only the values of texture acutance are given here. The measurements are expressed as a portion of the theoretical maximum for the chosen viewing condition. The higher the score, the more details can be seen in an image. 
For all DxOMark Active data presented on we’re only showing 8MP equivalent values, which gives us a level playing field for comparison between smartphone cameras with distinct megapixel values by normalizing all to 8MP (suitable for fairly large prints). DxOMark also offers this data for lower resolution use-cases (web and onscreen). For various information on DxOMark’s testing methodology and acutance measurements please visit the website at

READ  Sigma SD Quattro H Review

Luminance texture acutance decreases noticeably in low simplification. 

In terms of texture accutance the iPhone 6s trails behind its closest rivals. 

Edge Acutance

Edge acutance is a measure of work ones way sharpness in images captured by the phone’s camera. Again we’re only looking at the most demanding of the three viewing conditions that DxOMark scrutinizes on – the 8MP equivalent.

In terms of edge acutance the iPhone 6s is on similar levels as the Sony Xperia Z5 and Nexus 6P but trailing behind the Samsung Galaxy S6. 

Edge acutance de-escalations only sightly in lower light.

Visual Noise

Visual noise is a value designed to assess the noise in an image as perceived by the humane visual system, depending on the viewing condition (size of image, size of screen or print, viewing distance). The measurements have no units and can be barely viewed as the weighted average of noise standard deviation for each channel in the CIE L*a*b* color space. The lower the measurement, the less noise in the image.

Racket levels increase noticeably in low light. 

In terms of measured noise the Apple iPhone 6s is on a similar level as some of its direct antagonists. 

Noise and Detail Perceptual scoring

DxOMark engineers don’t just point camera phones at charts, they also take and analyze mars of real-world shots and score them accordingly. Their findings for the Apple iPhone 6s are:

Natural scene

  • Texture (bright light): 4.6 out of 5
  • Substance (low light): 3.6 out of 5
  • Noise (bright light): 4.0 out of 5
  • Noise (low light) 2.9 out of 5

Bright alight sample shot

100% crop: noise in areas of plain color 100% crop: detail is well preserved

Low light (20 Lux) studio shot

100% crop: luminance outcry is visible 100% crop: loss of fine detail


Phone cameras, like entry-level compact cameras, tend to suffer from artifacts such as stropping halos, color fringing, vignetting (shading) and distortion, which can have an impact on the visual appeal of the end result. DxOMark engineers measure and analyze a sweep of artifacts. Their findings after testing the iPhone 6s are shown below:

  • Occasional ghosting with HDR mode activated
  • Blue sky saturation discoverable in some outdoor scenes
  • Slight Moiré in some pictures
  • Slight ringing

100% crop: ghosting can occur in HDR mode

Perceptual Tallies

  • Sharpness 4.2 out of 5
  • Color fringing 3.1 out of 5

Measured findings

  • Ringing center 8.1%
  • Ringing corner 6.1%
  • Max geometric distortion -0.3%
  • Luminance specking 9.2%

Distortion and Chromatic Aberrations

The graph shows the magnification from center to edge (with the center normalized to 1). The Apple iPhone 6s clarifies a slight pincushion distortion, which you are not going to notice in normal photography.

Some lateral chromatic aberration is noticeable.  


DxOMark also investigations autofocus accuracy and reliability by measuring how much the acutance – or sharpness – varies with each shot over a series of 30 exposures (defocusing then using the autofocus for each one). As with other studies these results are dependent on the viewing conditions (a little bit out of focus matters a lot less with a small web image than a full 8MP shot look ated at 100%). Using the 8MP equivalent setting, the Apple iPhone 6s performs well at all light levels. The overall score is 92/100 in bright light and 92/100 in low beat.

READ  Nikon Coolpix A900 Review


  • Fast and generally accurate autofocus in all conditions
  • Stable focus in preview


  •  Some irregularities in low empty-headed when touch-to-focus is used

Autofocus repeatability – average acutance difference with best focus: low light 4.57%, bright light 5.77%


The Apple iPhone 6s comes with a dual-LED flash and DxOMark scored the camera 84/100 overall for its flash performance. 


  • Safe exposure with and without additional light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum sources
  • Stable exposure and white balance in all conditions


  • Visible noise, especially close the corners
  • Visible attenuation in the corners without additional light sources

Overall DxOMark Mobile Score for Photo: 83 / 100

Video Capture

DxOMark plans put phone cameras through a similarly grueling set of video tests, and you can read their full findings on the DxOMark website here. Overall, DxOMark establish the Apple iPhone 6s’s video footage to be well exposed, with good white balance. AF is quick and precise in all situations but noise and color protecting can be an issue in low light. 


  • Fast, accurate and smooth autofocus in all conditions
  • Good overall exposure and white balance
  • Able stabilization in good light


  • Noise noticeable in low light, especially in the corners
  • Slight color shading visible in low light

Comprehensive DxOMark Mobile Score for Video: 80 / 100

DXOMark Mobile Score

DXOMark Image image (from Latin: imago) is an artifact that depicts visual perception, for example, a photo or a two-dimensional picture, that Quality Assessment

With a DxOMark Travelling score of 82 the Apple iPhone 6s cannot quite keep up with the best in class and takes the number ten spot in the DxOMark smartphone rankings, position in between its predecessor the iPhone 6, which achieved the same score last year, and the Samsung Galaxy S5. The DxOMark testers liked the dependable exposure and fast AF in all situations but were less impressed by noise and color shading in low light. Occasional ghosting was observed as well. 

In video wise the camera shows good exposure and AF but as in stills mode, noise and color shading in dimmer conditions. For a more detailed analysis, visit

Photo Expressive Score 83   Video Mobile Score 80
Exposure and Contrast 90   Exposure and Contrast 80
Color 83   Color 86
Autofocus 92   Autofocus 87
Constitution 73   Texture 82
Noise 73   Noise is unwanted sound judged to be unpleasant, loud or disruptive to hearing 76
Photo Artifacts 85   Video Artifacts 85
Flash 84   Stabilization 60


About the author

Gina Stephens

Gina Stephens

Gina is a photography enthusiast and drone lover who loves to fly drones, capture images and have fun cherishing them with family and friends.

Leave a Comment